WL> We already know Clinton has no sense of shame; apparently he
 WL> either is counting on Judge Wright's decision not being
 WL> overturned, or he lacks the intelligence with which even his
 WL> harshest critics echo have credited him.  This matter is not
 WL> over; even if he never has an opportunity to try to charm a
 WL> jury (and then claim they were biased against him if/when they
 WL> find him guilty anyway), the history books (well, some of them
 WL> anyway) will record him as a sleazeball and suspected criminal.
The most DAMNING thing about Bubba is and isn't about him and his partnerette
le criminale (that's partner in crime in French, for those of you in Rio 
Linda)
is the fact that the Peepul elected him not once, but TWICE! to the prime 
office in the country. DOes this lying criminal in Presidental pants (well, 
perhaps not in them as often as he should be) REALLY reflect the country that 
elevated him? WIll Rogers said that we get the government we deserve...felons 
like Bubba indicate we are on a Roman decline with Bubba in the role of the
Emporer Tiberius... or perhaps Caligula? 
Don't get me wrong; I did not IMO waste my votes on him. I rather think that 
there is still good in this country. For history.. honest history will brand
this man the criminal of office in this century only after two: Hitler and 
Stalin.
{screed mode deactivated}
RKB
... Communists do it without class.
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 [NR]
--- Hyper No Mo Mail! Corvette BBS
 -=> Quoting Steve Fragner to Walter Luffman <=-
 SF> Being a route driver I listen to the radio everyday.  I listen to
 SF> Rush's radio program most days.  The one thing I dislike is the
 SF> tendency to harp on the same subject for days on end.  Though I do not
I'd admit that Rush's program spends a lot of time covering the
same ground, but that's largely because Rush talks about whatever
is grabbing the headlines and news-airtime on a given day.  If a
story stays in the news for several days, he and the callers will
discuss the new developments as well as all that has gone before.
Rush made a decision at the very beginning of the national show
to do a program that doesn't pre-plan topics or book guests as
most other national programs did...and still do, for that matter.
As he puts it, his show is event-driven rather than topic-driven.
 SF> agree with Rush often(if I did I would have to  see a therapist since
 SF> disagreeing is a natural human instinct) when he is  right it is
 SF> because he has done his "homework". 
From what little I've been able to gather from the few magazine
articles and TV features that have been done on him, he does a
lot of homework.  It starts with e-mail and faxes that come in
after each day's show, adds TV news and newsmagazines that
evening, and continues with more e-mail until late into the
night.  The next morning begins with newspapers and the morning
TV news shows, may continue with an all-news radio station on
the way to the office, then adds snailmailmail and more
newspapers (for a total of eight each day) to the combination
of TV news, e-mail and faxes.  Throw in a little time spent
with news magazines and other media outlets, and you've got a
full day with little room for a social life; but Rush and Marta
aren't big on the social scene anyway.
I wouldn't want to live like that; but I'm glad Rush enjoys it,
because it means I can enjoy listening to Rush.
Walter, wluffman@usit.net    CompuServe: 74721,3464
... When in doubt...no, don't do that either.
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------