-=> Quoting Dan Arico to Guy Putnam <=-
 GP> DA> Anybody who is critical of the NRA over actions that took place
 GP> ten DA> years ago is really talking about a different organization.
 
 GP> How about NRA supporting the Terror Bill & its destruction of the
 GP> Bill of Rights . . . . . . . . just last month!?
 DA> I'm not going to try to defend it because I didn't agree with that 
 DA> decision. 
I would hope not, as it was a decision that promoted International Fascism,
& the death of freedom in America, as well as the coming murder of American
families . . . .
 DA> I was opposed to the bill because its bad parts outweighed
 DA> its  good parts. The problem is - it *was* a judgment call.
It was?  Could you please list some of the "good parts" for me?
 DA> I'd like to see the NRA taking a more pro-active role in legislation 
 DA> like this. 
You mean you'd like to see NRA supporting even _more_ Fascist legislation?
 DA> If it can be prevented from being introduced, we don't have
 DA> to worry about defeating it. 
NRA supports "law & order," remember?!
 DA> Our problem in doing this, however, is
 DA> the  current Republican leadership still includes people like Henry
 DA> Hyde who  are anti-gun. I think the key to dealing with this problem
 DA> lies in  grassroots organization.
And NRA is anti-gun . . . . .
--- Blue Wave v2.12 [NR]
---------------