skanary{at}yahoo.com wrote:

>> "And two shall become one."  I can start a sentence and
my wife can
>> end it.  What of that "conglomeration"?
>
> Your wife is a separate being, subordinate to you in rank, authority,
> and position.
>
> The Bible illustrates it beautifully and perfectly:

Isn't it funny that 1.  You understand the point in the context
of "man and wife" (namely that there are two persons yet only
one couple)  and 2.  You admit that the Bible illustrates this
dynamic perfectly and beautifully.

AND YET:  You deny what the Bible says so beautifully and
perfectly, and the only argument you can come up with that
the Trinity is not the true God is that you count persons
and then, when you're done counting, change "persons"
to "gods" and declare polytheism.

How is it you understand "two persons yet one couple"
but you can't understand (and I don't mean "accept" or
"believe", only just "understand") "three persons yet
one God?"

This is typical of the JW inconsistant fundamentalism.

Bart

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group.  All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
(((   Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post.   )))


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/11/05 12:41:54 AM ---