BG> One could be forgiven for thinking so, but considering that
BG> ALL of the Rockwell V.34s tested returned almost identical line
BG> levels, I'm no longer convinced. After all, 13dB is a bloody
BG> large difference to have to explain away.  I guess the question
BG> now is, how much faith can we place in the USR's line stats?

JF> They're pretty reliable.

RS> Precision science there Bill. Notice he doesnt
RS> actually say if he has actually TRIED a call over the
RS> same lines with a USR and then a non USR on the SAME line.

BG> So tell him Rod, not me.

You have been waving them around in here, claiming they
signify something useful. Pity they dont and its classic
waffle. Particularly when its not a USR on the other end.

JF> What is the DSP date on the USR, and what are
JF> the version numbers from the rockwell chipsets?

RS> Absolutely classic fob off, make the person asking the question
RS> run around collecting completely fucking useless info.

BG> Once again, no point telling me.

Fraid so, I'll point out classic fobbing off if I feel like it.

RS> Tell the prick to get of his arse and TRY it for
RS> himself. THEN, *IF* he cant reproduce the effect,
RS> it might make some sense to check version numbers.

BG> No thanks, you can tell him yourself.

No thanks, its hardly likely to get him off his arse and doing something.

RS> Pathetic.

BG> Agreed.  Why you didn't just address this to Joe Frankiewicz is beyond me.

Welp, if you seriously think that he would have stopped waffling on
like this just because I pointed out to him that he was doing that...
@EOT:

---