PE> Quite simple for you to blow wind out of your arse actually.  
PE> In summary, you don't even know that the Netcomm is not doing
PE>  64-state trellis coding, you have never looked.  To be able 
PE> to see, you need the USR stats from a Netcomm CALLING a USR.  
PE> Got any of them handy? No, I didn't think so.

DD> Check my recent posts.  TWO different Rockwell modems connecting here to 
DD> the Sportster.  BOTH displaying 16-state trellis

BG> Let him go, Dave.  He's digging himself in so deep on this one, he'll 
BG> likely never get out.  Funniest thing I've seen in ages too.  :)

Poor old Bill.  There's really no-one home is there?

1. My INTERPRETATION of the spec says that the calling modem must
respond to a request for 64S trellis coding.  I am more than happy
for someone to point to the bit in the spec that I overlooked.

2. I wanted to see the RESULTS of the USR stats after a Netcomm called
it, for some EVIDENCE of the M34F not responding to a request for 64S.

In neither of the above did I make Bill Grimsley Guarantees.
BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---