| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Internal processing erro |
Original from Klaus Mahlmann to All on 11-12-1996
Original Subject: Internal processing error
---------------------------------------
KM> After develloping a OS/2 application which runs in a quite
KM> complex environment (software from three different parties
KM> on one machine, OS/2 in a Novell environment) we've got the
KM> problem that about once a day the OS/2 machine will crash
KM> and display:
KM>
KM> The system detected an internal processing error
KM> at location ##0160:fff55890 - 000d:3890
KM> 60001, 5049
KM> 048600b4
KM> Internal revision 8.200, 94/11/09
KM> The system is stopped. Please record...
I don't trust that location from info in any of the map files
I can generate from the sym file at this level or the dumps I have
access to. Can you try updating one of the machines to FP 10 level
(BLDLEVEL OS2KRNL should report 8.210) or higher and retest? If there
is any other information on the screen, I would like that also..
It looks like it is involved in updating or doing something with the
system file tables if the addresses can be trusted. But I cannot find
any close calls to the IPE routine in that area - and I usually can
for these kinds of things. I'll check further later..
If the addresses are correct, it is far inside a routine called
_IOSFTTRANSPATH and I would guess that it has something to do with the
Novell requester. Does this problem have anything to do with accessing
network files or resources? Is it possible that the "program" is
causing the Novell code to make some errors in it's updating of the
system file table entries?
KM> As far as I understand it, this means that the kernel ran
KM> into a situation it couldn't handle, and called the "panic"
KM> routine.
Yep.
KM> There have been suggestions that there is a OS2KRNL.MAP or
KM> OS2KRNL.SYM file which could at least tell me where in the
KM> kernel 0160:fff55890 is. From that, I might be able to
KM> deduce what kind of operation was going on. Problem is, I
KM> haven't found such a map file anywhere.
There are symbol files around that can be used (in either a dump or
KDB session - they will be different for a KDB session) that are a
"result" of some processing of MAP files. I can "reverse" this
processing to get back to a "pseudo-map" file also. I still prefer to
use a dump directly, as I can usually see exactly what the code is
doing at that address.
Denis
All opinions are my very own, IBM has no claim upon them
.
.
--- Maximus/2 3.01
* Origin: T-Board - (604) 277-4574 (1:153/908)SEEN-BY: 50/99 270/101 620/243 625/160 711/401 409 410 413 430 808 809 934 SEEN-BY: 711/955 712/407 515 624 628 713/317 800/1 @PATH: 153/908 8086 800 270/101 712/515 711/808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.