| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | netcomm |
BG> Terminal : 57600 8 data bits No Parity BG> Line : 26400 V.34 BG> Current EQM : 009 PE> And a 26400 connect to David on a better line. BG> Yeah, that was a bit of a surprise. Wonder why? RS> Somethings seriously fucked there somewhere. We do know RS> that Daves line is MUCH better than Pauls, so that result is RS> completely mad on the connect rate, tho the EQM makes sense. PE> I have documented the problem of M34F calling PE> USR already. Against BOTH modems actually. All you did was document the lower connect rate achieved. That message was discussing the EQM value and whether the lower connect rate achieved was related to the EQM. Clearly it isnt in that particular case of a good EQM. @EOT: ---* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.