| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | V.34 test #4 |
RS> you were doing the SAME thing, mindlessly binning useful evidence RS> which was all that was available and proclaiming that there was RS> just one valid way to consider the issue being considered, using RS> some silly idea about the only valid way to test possibilitys. RS> Soorree, the real world aint like that Paul, at times you have RS> to use the evidence thats less than ideal, coz its all you've RS> fucking got. And whatever you proclaim, its quite feasible to RS> get useful information from the less than ideal evidence. RS> That is possible right now on the question of the quality of your line. RS> We have the Courier/Courier stats when your line was called by Russ from RS> FNQ from that immaculate line. We have the comparison with the data on the RS> other calls he made to a Courier, and can deduce some useful information RS> on the state of your line compared with say the state of Bills line. RS> You can also check the Courier/Courier stats by RS> making sure they do correlate with CPS figures so RS> there cant be anything do drastic wrong with them. PE> And what do the Courier/M34F stats on the CPS figures say, Rod? No one is saying that ONLY the cps figures are relevant dorko. There is an obvious discrepancy with the Courier/non Courier stats, the gross shift of around 6db in the whole curve. RS> You can proclaim that the one valid way to measure lines is to hire RS> test equipment and use it on the lines being looked at if you like, RS> pity the real world is that that that AINT the only way. Tho it would RS> certainly be nice to do that if the cost wasnt a consideration. PE> I didn't say that. You did basically, proclaiming that the USR/USR stats are completely useless and of no value whatever. Which essentially means that that other approach with specialised test equipment is the only thing you think is a viable way to measure a specific line. PE> In fact, the M34F may well be a way of telling PE> line quality, that has yet to be determined. Which essentially means that you are currently proclaiming that there aint no way to characterise a line except test equipment. RS> I've binned the rest of your massive brain fart on 0100, pathetic. And I've binned your even more pathetic raving on thats even worse. @EOT: ---* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.