>     I  have  noticed  two errors  in  the  configuration of
 > FrontDoor systems Compatibility/Capability Flags.

I have noticed two errors in your interpretation of the FSC-0056 document.

 >     Zmodem  is  the MINIMUM required protocol, is MUST be the
 > LAST protocol in the list. No other protocol should follow
 > it.

Excuse me? WHERE does it say that the "minimum required protocol"
should be stated last?

Quote:
    The calling system must list supported protocols first and descending
    order of preference (the most desirable protocol should be listed
    first). The answering system should only present one protocol and it
    should be the first item in the compatibility_codes field.

Besides the fact that "in" is missing from the first sentence, I
don't see anything that would support what you state.

 >     SeaLink, depending upon implementation, has a throughput
 > equal or better than  ZedZap.   Again,  depending  upon
 > implementation, it should be listed either  before or after
 > ZAP inthe list, sysop's choice.  However, it should NEVER be
 > the LAST protocol in the list.

According to whom? Your own personal opinion? If so, mine differs.

---