The following report was found on another net under a `handle' in
a liberal political echo.  It could be encouraging or otherwise.
Nontheless, you have some material to watch for.  I can not vouch for
the material, but some of it does sound an alarm.
     Bear in mind that Mr. Slick has a large full time legal staff for
his own defense paid for with taxpayer money to oppose a prosecutors
staff of limited resources.  It is clear that many precidences  have
been made which will influence the American System for decades to come.
This is the first time that an accused person has openly attacked the
prosecution to such a gigantic degree in the Liberal Media!
     I See No Sense In Purchasing Any Product Whose Company Supports
Such Openly Biased Reports In Favor Of An Accused Person.  Especially
since it is customary for there to be silence as prosecutorial agencies
seek to prove or disprove any and all allegations.  Such manipulation
in itself "Obstruction!"
From a person `Centurion'   To all.
Subject: Starr About to File  (DRUDGE REPORT CODE RED)
19:03:44 PDT TUE APRIL 07 1998
WASHINGTON POST BOMBSHELL:  STARR'S REPORT READY TO DROP
The DRUDGE REPORT has been briefed on a WASHINGTON POST exclusive that
will send a jolt through official Washington:  Portions of Kenneth
Starr's Lewinsky/Clinton report for the House now said to be ready.
The POST's Sue Schmidt has been working for days building her exclusive
story, it has been learned.  "Starr's prosecutors have already written
large sections of their report to the House of Representatives on
potentially impeachable offenses by President Clinton in the Monica S.
Lewinsky matter, and sources close to the investigation said they may
also include material related to Clinton's sworn testimony about
Arkansas financial dealings."
The Schmidt's report is scheduled to appear in Wednesday bulldog
editions of the paper, Page One, occupying nearly the entire above the
fold.
For the first time in his four-year investigation of the president,
Starr's team has assembled evidence that they believe requires a report
to the House of Representatives.
Starr has a goal of releasing his Hill report within the next 7 weeks,
says the paper.
Schmidt reports that the submission of a report to the House is "an
implicit finding that potentially impeachable offenses may have
occurred."
The independent counsel statute mandates that such a report be made
whenever prosecutors find "any substantial and credible information ..
that may constitute grounds for an impeachment."
While highlighting the Lewinsky case, Schmidt reveals that one
Whitewater-related matter may also become part of Starr's report to the
House.  It concerns separate allegations of perjury by the president
during the 1996 bank fraud trial of the McDougals.
Schmidt, using "sources close to the investigation," also reveals that
several of Starr's investigations now appear to be concluding without
charges.
They are:
*The search of deputy White House counsel Vince Foster's office after
 his July 1993 suicide.
*The aftermath of 1993 firings in the White House travel office.
*The mysterious discovery of Hillary Clinton's long sought Rose Law
 Firm billing records.
[Schmidt reports that Starr has not been able to learn who had the
 records while they were missing, why/how they suddenly appeared.]
*The FBI FILES mess.  [Starr does not appear to have found evidence
 that aides who sought the files were acting on a request from higher-
 ups.]
Developing...
                     DRUDGE REPORT CODE RED UPDATE
                     20:42:52 PDT TUE APRIL 07 1998
WHITE HOUSE BLASTS LEAK TO PAPER, MAY ASK RENO TO PROBE
A senior White House staffer working late Tuesday night blasted a story
set for publication in the WASHINGTON POST, warning that White House
lawyers will demand a full investigation into "out of control leaks
coming out of Ken Starr's office."
"This may have just cost someone his job," a senior White House staffer
told the DRUDGE REPORT.  "Whoever leaked this information is in direct
violation of court order."
The WASHINGTON POST's Sue Schmidt reports in bulldog editions that
Starr and his prosecutors have already written "large sections of their
report to the House of Representatives on potentially impeachable
offenses by President Clinton in the Monica S.  Lewinsky matter."  She
also revealed that Starr may include material related to Clinton's
sworn testimony about Arkansas financial dealings.
Schmidt identified information from "sources close to the
investigation" throughout her report.  The story is the most detailed
account of Starr's secret findings yet to reach public air.
"After this, I would imagine that Janet Reno will have to move in to
determine what kind of game Starr is playing here," the White House
staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, explained to the DRUDGE
REPORT.
The aide refused to address the possibility that President Clinton
would ask for Starr's dismissal.
U.S. District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson held a hearing last month
into whether prosecutors have improperly leaked confidential
information in the Lewinsky mess.
The outcome of the hearing is not known.
The LOS ANGELES TIMES reported on Feb. 25 that Starr's own effort to
launch a structured internal investigation of his office was foiled by
Deputy Atty.  Gen.  Eric Holder.  Holder's reasoning was that he did
not want to use FBI agents and Justice Department lawyers to impinge on
Johnson's prerogatives.
Washington was rocked by initial reports of Wednesday's WASHINGTON POST
blockbuster story:
"Starr and his legal staff have for the first time in the four-year
investigation of the president assembled evidence that they believe
requires a report to the House of Representatives. The independent
counsel statute mandates that such a report be made whenever
prosecutors find 'any substantial and credible information ... that may
constitute grounds for an impeachment.'"
"People rushed to the Web" to read the news, a press secretary to a
ranking GOP congressman e-mailed from Capitol Hill.
"The immediate reaction in the office was 'Oh my God, we're really
heading for impeachment hearings?'  It was a scary moment."
____________________________________________________
Filed by Matt Drudge
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 1998
--- Aeolus v1.2.1 (#49820837)
---------------