Hello Dick.
R>> As you may have deduced from my (somewhat) quick response to the
R>> Southern Star Echolist Expiration Warning Robot, I am indeed
R>> paying attention to this echo
RM> ... And anyone who would like to check into it could figger out that
RM> ALL you need to do is pay attention ONCE every six months for the
RM> echolist warning, send your reply (couse you KNOW exactly when that
RM> has to be done), BINGO it LOOKS like your paying attention.
RM> BTW, the next warning is due october first, after 30 days of no update
RM> you loose the echo. See, were are not so naive or stupid, Scott. You
RM> have proved nothing.
Well, Dick, I wasn't really trying to prove anything. You seem to be
implying that the purpose of my message was to deceive people into thinking
that I've been paying attention and that I really haven't been. Are you
indeed making this claim?
Oh, by the way, if I had known the date of the echolist expiration, I would
have sent in an update before the warning message was posted. A proof of
this claim is omitted.
R>> This may come as a surprise to you, especially if you have been
R>> heeding certain comments about how I don't care about what goes on
R>> here, or that I am more interested in my "three other echos"
RM> Prove that you do care.
Proof is for mathematics and liquor.
R>> If you don't like the fact that certain asses are spewing their
R>> vomitous goo in this echo, then you are encouraged to [1] educate
R>> the asses in question, or [2] ignore the asses in question. You
R>> are also free to follow any other path that does not violate Rule
R>> Zero
RM> Define philosophy. As it is you can ban anyone anytime as you please
RM> and some how interpret it as a violation of rule 0. Paper tiger, that
RM> all. Remindes me of the UN.
The love of wisdom.
Yes, indeed I could use my feed cut power in an arbitrary manner.
I don't see what your point is, though.
I also don't get the UN analogy.
Rev
--- GoldED 2.50+
---------------
* Origin: The Void (1:206/2717)
|