Ú@X07ÄÄùÄ@X08Äù On 06-03-96, Grey Hodge was sayingÄÄ-----úúúú
@X07³
MSGID: 1:129/179.0 31b3a6fe
³ HC> Well, every once in a while, there is a computer that works,
barel
³
³I work for a computer company, I'm a tech, and I have yet to find a
sys
³which Win95 doesn't work. All of our new systems ship with it by
defaul
³we've done a lot of upgrades to run it...
³
³ HC> I just found out that in 95, Adobe Premiere runs better than my
³ HC> DX4-100 than my friends Pentium 200. Wierd, and Premiere 4.0, the
³ HC> one is 4.2, Premiere 4.0 runs better than 4.2 while using WFW
3.11
³ HC> so I heard, runs even best in Mac.
³
³First, it runs better on any computer compared to a non existant
comput
³You see, there is no Pentium running at 200MHz, Pentium Pro CPUs yes,
b
³no Pentiums... WfW has less overhead both in RAM and CPU time, so it's
³possible that it runs better. Runs best on a Mac? That I would be hard
³to believe...
@X07³
ÀÄ--ùÄ@X08ÄùHansel Chung humbly replies--ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ-------úúúúúúúú@X0F
I made a small mistake, yes there is no Pentium 200, it was a P166, not
200, the 200 I got confused on because one of my friends while I was
writing this message, he was chatting about something on Alpha 200s, and
somehow I typed the wrong number. But either ways, Premiere was a whole
7 seconds off in the sync between computers, and only to find that the
sync option is not default and hidden in the far depths of the config
menus. I still says it don't run that well, because it takes time beyond
reason to compile a video 5 mins long.
I've heard better about Alphas, and PPCs running Premiere, probably
because of the CPU capibilities.
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/M 2
---------------