Hi Pascal.

27-Nov-03 21:19:14, Pascal Schmidt wrote to Tom Walker


 PS> Hi Tom! :-)

 TW>> Here is the Study. Sorry it was Cal Tech instead of MIT. This is
 TW>> an article published in Nature Magazine. Hydrogen is NOT the big
 TW>> Answer touted by the Anti-Nuclear Crazies, and others.
 PS> The study itself claims that the advantages of hyrogen fuel likely
 PS> outweight the disadvantages

 PS> Another interesting question would be whether the ozone layer
 PS> could be replenished in some way. It's not that hard to
 PS> artificially produce ozone, or is it

not hard at all A high voltage between two water electrodes in oxygen gas.
is one way

The hard bit is getting it up to the stratosphere, the specific mass of air
is about 28, ozone is 48, nearly twice as much. (this means ozone is nearly
twice as heavy as air)

Chemically, ozone is a powerful oxidiser it's used industrially as a
bleach, it's toxic.

 -=> Bye <=-

---