PE> Be forewarned, I am now armed with a printed copy of the V.34 spec.

BG> I severely doubt you'd even begin to know how to interpret them anyway...

PE> Coming from the man who interprets USR saying "unlike some modems"
PE> (which even covers V.32bis-only modems), "USR implements the V.34
PE> standard properly" as "The Netcomm M34F does not conform to the 
PE> V.34 spec", I take that as a compliment. 

BG> Well your first interpretation, that Rockwell supports 64 state trellis, 
BG> was such a fuck up, that I wonder why you bothered continuing with it...

Where did I make that interpretation, Bill?  You don't interpret
something like that, you just go and find out if it does.  So far
all I've noticed is you blowing wind out of your arse.  I have
asked Netcomm though, haven't seen a reply yet (not surprising since
I haven't dialled yet).  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---