-=> PASCAL SCHMIDT wrote to TOM WALKER <=-

 PS> Hi Tom! :-)

 TW> Here is the Study. Sorry it was Cal Tech instead of MIT. This is an
 TW> article published in Nature Magazine.
 TW> Hydrogen is NOT the big Answer touted by the Anti-Nuclear Crazies,
 TW> and others.
 PS> The study itself claims that the advantages of hyrogen fuel likely
 PS> outweight the disadvantages.

 PS> Another interesting question would be whether the ozone layer could be
 PS> replenished in some way. It's not that hard to artificially produce
 PS> ozone, or is it?

It's not the hydrogen that damages the ozone but rather using
fossil fuels as the source from which to extract it that causes
the problem.

Like I said before if that M.I.T. researcher succeeds in duplicating
the manner in which plants break the hydrogen - oxygen bond
synthetically the problem disappears.

Fusion power could also be used to supply oxygen and hydrogen
from water without ozone destroying or greenhouse gasses
once fusion's a practical reality
 
--- MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.45