JM>> multi-tasking was fantastic. But to develop a application for a OS
 JM>> that it's own creators have pulled development for would not make
 JM>> economic sense.
 JB>> Let's get things straight.. IBM has not pulled development for OS/2.
 JB>> Furthermore, if 3Com wanted to cover as close to 100% of the market as
 JB>> possible, they'd write the application in JAVA.
 BE> But IBM DID drop support for Team OS/2.
Team OS/2 is/was a grassroots organization... IBM never had to support them 
in the first place...
)\/(ark
---------------