15 Oct 97 16:48, Roy J. Tellason wrote to Joe E. Dodson:
RJT>Joe E. Dodson wrote in a message to Elvis Hargrove:
JED>> 14 Oct 97 11:54, Elvis Hargrove wrote to Mike Ross:
->>> Turbines have 1 moving part and develop more HP pound for pound
EH>>I think you'll find this is not the case.  Turbines have MANY moving
EH>>parts.
JED>> And if he ever saw one come apart he would understand why
JED>> there aren't that many under the hood of a car.
RJT>I never saw one come apart,  but I was of the impression that the reason 
RJT>they weren't used in cars was because they were a whole lot more 
expensive 
RJT>than conventional engines.  Is this not the case?
Partly.
-Joe
jdodson@smart1.net
--- Msged/2 4.10
(1:106/977@fidonet)
---------------