MP>What is even sadder is that you failed to answer my questions. I asked
MP>only two, and a "yes" or "no" will do.
EVERYTHING printed in the field of chemical dependency by those who are
serious researchers or by those who write about what they have done is
subject to "peer review", the most critical in the history of human
thought.  It is subject to review by every sober drunk in the world.
And they can be quite specific when reviewing anything.  The test of any
paper on addiction, any of the work by any professional is whether or
not it will filter down to the level where it is talked about by those
who attend 12th step meetings.
Got news for you.  What I quote has passed that test with the exception
of Rosencrans work.  That didn't seem to penetrate down....but Blum's
work did.  So has Terry Neher's and the other gentleman I quoted.  Where
do you think I found out about them?
MP>JK{ Have you found the paper by Jeffery Rosencrans as yet?  The one on
MP>JK{ the two animo acids?
MP>FIDO was significantly interupted on Long Island for about a week. A
MP>complete library reference by you will allow for my obtaining it.
You do your own research.  You are supposed to be so damn smart so go
find it.  I got mine by hearing of his work then writing the hospital
several years ago.  Mine is from the author, not from a journal.
 * SLMR 2.1a * All wiyht.  Rho sritched mg kegtops awound?
 
--- JCQWK
---------------