->  TW> Here is the Study. Sorry it was Cal Tech instead of MIT. This is an
->  TW> article published in Nature Magazine.
->  TW> Hydrogen is NOT the big Answer touted by the Anti-Nuclear Crazies, 
->  TW> and others. 
-> The study itself claims that the advantages of hyrogen fuel likely outweight
-> the disadvantages.

That would be in 50 years or so "IF" we solve the leakage problem.
But IF we get the Cary Beforew the Horse like the Nutcakes are
clammoring for we will INCREASE the Damage.

-> Another interesting question would be whether the ozone layer could be
-> replenished in some way. It's not that hard to artificially produce ozone, or
-> is it?

 Ozeon is very easy to produce. BUT the problem is getting it UP there
and having it Stay up there. 
No matter what we will still have to live with the Largest DEstroyer of
the Ozone and that is Erupting Volcanos.
That Large Philippine Volcano eruption released more Ozone Destroying
Chemicals into the Upper Atmosphere then all the Production of FREON
since it's invention.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5