Date: 07 Jun 95 18:35:01 Public
From: Tim Spofford
To: Bill McVay
Subject: Thanks, y'all
> You must have started networking pretty early in your sobriety.
> Seems to me we have been typing at one another for years.
I ran into Bob K., whom I had known pretty well in the halfway house we were
in
together, on the street in the Castro one day when we were both about
ourteen
months sober. He told me he had started "an AA BBS". What the f*ck is a BBS,
I
asked. He tried to tell me. I didn't get it. But one thing led to another
and
I managed to figure out how to get my dumb terminal to dial up Recovery BBS
in,
as best I can figure out, October 1986. (Recovery BBS went online on July 4,
1986.) One thing led to another.
== GEcho 1.11+
Origin: Kirkland, WA, V34/FAX: 206-827-9613 (1:343/261)
Date: 13 Jul 95
From: Marge Clark (116/3000)
To: Tim Dill (102/541)
Subject: history2.txt
thanks for passing that along, Tim.
there's one thing that I would add to it, that Tim's msg skipped over, as far
as the history of sip_aa is concerned...
Recovery BBS, in SF, had (probably still has, I dunno) an extremely active
LOCAL AA conference. At one time they were a recognized group, sending their
financial contributions to GSO and the locals, etc. Prior to my
involvement
in the recovery echoes, they had been asked to let their private conference
go
national. A group conscience was held, and the members of the group voted
No.
(I'm not sure when that happened, or under the auspices of which sysop; Tim
S.
would know.)
When the thought of making sip_aa a national/international echo, readily
available to any of us who wanted it first surfaced, I knew that *I* wanted
all the crew from San Francisco involved. The best way I could see to pull
them in was a melding of Joe Jared's little SIP echo, and the local AA area
on
Recovery (by this time Rich G. [our favorite Alanon]) was the sysop.
A new group conscience was held by the members of the group, and they very
kindly and graciously sacrificed their virtual 'closed meeting' for the good
of
us all. I am totally convinced that had the group conscience vote gone the
other way, and we lacked the participation of the SF crew, we never would
have
gotten off the ground.
At that time, the requirements for 'boning a new echo were in some ways
harder
to meet. As I recall there had to be at least 25 systems showing in the
seenbyes and a minimum message traffic far greater than some present backbone
echoes have. Got to the minimum goals very simply and easily (albeit
expensively ;-) I offered to deliver the new echo on my dime to any sysop
that
would agree to carry it. We met our minimum requirements in less than three
weeks ;-)
I drafted the echo rules; Tim S. rewrote them extensively; the 'we bring
ourselves to the clearing with us, it is our struggle that makes us whole'
was
lifted from a message from The Moose in the echo, and the rules were put out
there for discussion, approval, and rewriting by those members currently
active
in the echo.
backtracking again, just a bit. When we were in the process of groping our
way
toward the decision that we did want/need an AA-only echo, several of the
'recovery sysops' were involved in netmail discussions of the who and how of
it.
It was Tim who told me that they (the mysterious 'they') had decided I
should
be the moderator. years later, I asked him how come me? (I had less
sobriety
by far than any of 'em.) the answer? "We thought it would be good for your
sobriety!"
he was right! ;-)
and there you have it...the rest of the story. ;-)
--- PPoint 2.00
---------------
* Origin: Nuclear Waste Software /*\ We Glow Too! (1:102/749.2)
|