PE> And where does the manual say that autobauding doesn't work on
PE> ATZ?  NOWHERE. 

BG> No, but the manual DOES tell you that you need to write any baud change to 
BG> NVRAM with AT&W.  

PE> No it doesn't.

BG> Fucking bullshit.  I've already posted that part of the manual which states 
BG> this, so I won't be bothering again. 

It doesn't.  You have only ever been able to post irrelevant stuff.
Your favourite is the &B2 when I am using &B1.

BG> And NOWHERE does it suggest using ATZ as an init$ anyway.

PE> It is listed as one of the commands.  An init string is just another
PE> command.  Nowhere does it say that you cannot issue the "ATZ"
PE> command. 

BG> And nowhere does it suggest that you use ATZ as an init$ either.  

BG> Your turn...

It's one of the commands.  In the absence of something saying that
ATZ is broken, there is no reason why it cannot be used as an init
string.  Of course they don't list every single init string you
can have, as that is infinite.  Do you actually have any grasp of
the real world at all, Bill?  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---