| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Points, Sending Mail |
HS> The question is, the packet header, should it have point HS> information in the header or not? no... not in the PKT from nodex to nodey... that point information was in the PKT from nodex.1 to nodex and from nodey.1 to nodey... the transfer from x to y is straight forward, no points involved... HS> My current design is that the PKT header address belongs HS> between the two interfacing nodes, so regardless of HS> having 1 message or 2 messages, the header would have: yup... HS> This is correct right? The message themselves will determine HS> the true destination. yup... HS> Comments? don't forget that a system may use a different AKA to deliver the mail with at times... i'm not sure about your software but i know that if i am in zone 1 and zone 2547 and i want to send mail from 2546:xxx/yyy to 2547:aaa/bbb it should not have my zone 1 address in the PKT header... idealy, messages in those PKTs should also not have the zone 1 address unless they are being gated... netmail is ok gated... echomail is gated in a completely different way and should not interferr with what you are doing... )\/(ark* Origin: (1:3634/12) SEEN-BY: 20/10 200/0 201/0 100 200 209 300 400 407 411 505 600 204/450 205/0 SEEN-BY: 206/0 270/101 490/21 633/267 270 @PATH: 3634/12 3651/9 396/1 270/101 201/505 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.