> From: "Rich" 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> ------=_NextPart_000_0588_01C401CC.EFF280E0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> More lies adam.  In this thread I have stuck with using redhat linux =
> 9 as my subject.  

Indeed but not linux. You chose RH 9. You chose a mutt vuln & you chose
a GAIM vuln.

> You have been all over the map repeatedly trying to =
> change the subject.

Hark at you. The very fact that you changed the subject line shows that you
changed the subject away from windows vulns to a specific linux
distribution & to 3'rd party applications within that distribution is
evidence of your desire to change the subject.

>  For god knows what reason you have even mentioned =
> the nearly 20 year old Windows 1.0 in an attempt to claim that redhat =
> linux 9 is not linux.

I was responing to Geo's point wrt "windows" vulnerabilites.

> Any reason you are so emotionally involved in this that you can't =
> manage to discuss the redhat linux 9 security vulnerabilities =
> rationally?

Why when the discussion was to do with Linux vulnerabilties compared to
"Windows" vulnerabilities?

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5