PR> For example, if gravitons can radiate and interact with the parallel
 PR> universe membranes, why haven't they all attracted each other?

 WC> Perhaps they oppose one another across dimensional planes?
 WC> WAG here as I've not read a solid book on quantum theory in many a
 WC> year.

 PR> Why don't we detect gravitic fields from a neighboring parallel
 PR> universe where we don't see matter in our universe?

 WC> Because it's parallel but perhaps not intersecting?
 WC> Another WAG.

Know anything about Abbott's "Flatland"?  According to their
presentation of M-Theory membranes, that's what we live in--as
seen from a higher dimensional perspective.

My arguments can be understood primarily based on geometry.

Imagine a 2-D universe.  In this 2-space universe stars radiate EM only
within the plane.  It's proposed gravitons interact weakly within the
plane because gravitons can escape from the plane into the third
dimension.  Those gravitons intersect another parallel 2-space universe.
That should be perceptible as a gravitational field, where there is no
mass.  It should be detectible instrumentally at least, but what should
happen is mass would be attracted and collect.  Thus mass concentrations
should basically match between parallel universes.  So what keeps the
first 2-D universe from detecting all those masses from neighbors.
Summed, you've got as much gravity as if the gravitons never left it in
the first place.

... The Internet is not a medium.  It is an extra large.
___ MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.35

---