RS> Yes, that approach has some theoretical validity, BUT we ALREADY know that
RS> the Rx level the M34F claims to have seen with one particular AT command
RS> is dud coz it says 50dbm all the time. Clearly the M34F has problems too.

PE> And we can bin the 50dbm result too.  We can recognize it and bin it.

RS> Yes, but YOU want to just bin ALL the USR data, even when there is
RS> another USR on the other end of the line. For some reason you only
RS> bin SOME of the M34F data, the data with the obvious problem.

Well it is obvious which bit of the M34F data is stuffed.  What is
not obvious is which bit of the USR data is stuffed.  I can see
what you mean about using the relativity only, on dual-USRs though.
BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---