> If the overall efficiency of an auto is thought important [by folk who are
 > wasteful with energy indoors!] then we assume that it would be a 
 > Good Thing to
 > use less energy in propelling the auto. Suddenly the problem gets 
 > very simple-
 > 
 > The surest way to save big on energy for an auto [regardless of what 
 >kind of motor it has] is to do these Un American [and Un Australian] 
hings-
 > Drive at lower speeds. Cut the engine during major delays. Use 
[[many more suggestions deleted]]
Alec,
 You're absolutely correct. I've said it here (and had it verified by those 
that are doin'): If you want to "save money" by installing some sort of home 
power setup, first change your lifestyle to that which will be supported by 
your new installation. It's pretty common to spend $10,000.00 or more to 
obtain 300 KWHR per month in electricity. You'll find that your electricity 
will cost somewhere between $20.00 and $35.00 per month, so where's the 
incentive to buy that PV setup? (I'm assuming that factory electricity is 
available)
Same with the car; get a small car and drive it like it would perform if it 
were electric and you'll have no need to go to an EV. The older, smaller 
Hondas cost less in fuel to operate than most EVs. What many people really 
want is to be able to drive a big 'ol 4X4 for 2 or 3 cents per gallon. It's 
called 'having your cake, and eating it too', and a popular signature 
describes it well:
TANNSTAAFL; There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch
--- FLAME v1.1
---------------