BG> Could be either modem at fault here, although my gut reaction is that it's
BG> the Thunder which is the problem, especially when one considers that David 
BG> has 5 or 6 Thunder callers who connect without any difficulties at all.

FM> Eh? Aren't you contradicting yourself here?

I don't think so.  I can't see any contradiction in the above.

FM> Anyway, the 2400/1200 connect problem with the Thunder was me and,
FM> AFAIK, Paul's description above is accurate. IOW there were *no*
FM> problems with his other modem, *nothing* was changed here when the
FM> problem started, and *nothing* was changed here when the problem went
FM> away.

Very strange.  Must be poltergeists then.

--- Msgedsq/2 3.20