DD> I use a Courier here (with a Sportster as a backup).  I have no complaints 
DD> regarding their performance at all.

PE> Which just goes to show how uncomprehensive your testing really is. 

BG> Why don't you two compare user lists?  If David has more callers (and I 
BG> suspect that he does), one would expect to see a proportional increase in 
BG> his problem connects, correct?

It's the same as the calls you did at CHH.  You only know how to
do the straightforward tests, which of course work.  I've documented
all the problems seen with the USR, and some of them have been
reproducible by you guys, and yet I was the ONLY one to report them.
Just goes to show how fucked you + Dave's tests are.

BG> BTW, how come I don't see this with your M34F... ?

BG> Note that the obsolete NetComm DOESN'T support V.34+, SREJ nor 64 State 
BG> trellis, and neither can it be upgraded to do so.

Because it doesn't support them.  So?  Doesn't cost me $200 extra
either.  So?  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---