On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:36:00 GMT, Flaagg
wrote:
>>>>>I don't need to believe -anything-
>>>>Of course you do.
>>>Of course I *don't*, I said.
>>What you say and what you mean are two entirely different things.
>What I say
Hey look, my burning Flaagg is back! It's about time you summed up
enough balls to reply to my post, what's the matter Flaagg, you
slippin?
>at you're able to -understand- might be two entirely
>different things, Goofus, but that's your problem, not mine.
Blah, blah, blah, did I ask you to defend yourself against me? I
wonder why you felt the need. Guess I just hit a little too close to
home, huh bud?
>>>Pay attention when I'm ridiculing you.
>>Now, now, don't be trying to get me to not pay attention to you so you
>>can run away like the cowardly little moron you are.
>Those are odd accusations coming from the quivering fuckball that
>redirects his replies out of AAVFFF and into fidonet.flame whenever I
>handle him a little roughly.
I believe in making my stupider obsessives work for their beatings.
You're the one in love with me, remember Stupid? Don't you get it yet
Stupid? I'm just using you. To me, you are nothing but a trigger,
and Usenet is the target.
>>>>If you didn't believe half the crap I spewed out
>>>>for you kooks to try and use to contend against me you'd have been
>>>>bootfucked long ago. Face it lackey, I'm the only thing keeping you
>>>>going. I mena you tout your l33t flaming skillz all the while not
>>>>realizing that *I'm* the one refueling yer gas my little barbekook.
>>>Well, that answers the "You just don't get the whole 'flaming for fun'
>>>CONCEPT, do you?" question well enough, doesn't it?
>>Oh, how so? Were you stupid enough to believe everything I said
>>again? I bet you were.
>I *said* you *answered* the "You just don't get the whole 'flaming for
>fun' CONCEPT, do you?" question, Goofus. You can stop now...you're
>clueless, OK, we get it.
My, my, look at you get upset. He, he, he, see Stupid, that's the
kind of reaction I'm looking for. I want you to feel, to get upset,
to want to try and get back at me for smackin your across the face
like the stupid bitch you are.
>>>>Hey I'm not a spongehead
>>>Post proof, Spongehead.
>>Okay, I am the one dousing your pathetic attempts at flaming, are ya
>>happy now?
>Claiming you're doing something you obviously aren't -capable- of
>doing isn't exactly the best way to prove you're not a spongehead,
>Spongehead.
So then you're saying you're the one responsible for dousing out your
pathetic attempts at flaming? Yeesh, make up yer mind Spankard. `, )
-Mad Hatter
|