Hello mark!

13 Apr 20 08:40, you wrote to me:

 SW>> The mail hub system process mail just a few seconds after it's
 SW>> dropped off.

 ml> cool... i wasn't sure... some systems (still) use scheduled processing
 ml> instead of instant...

The hub system runs as a vps on my server in a datacentre, so has plenty of 
bandwidth and cpu power to do
processing right away. #_)

 SW>> I have done a test from my bbs system, and it receives the
 SW>> message about not fiding +ALL as well, so it's not  Tom's system
 SW>> at fault.

 ml> ok... i know we found some few problems here and there with his mailer
 ml> setup that we got fixed... missing directories here and there and a
 ml> few other things... we got that all fixed and we were able to test
 ml> direct netmail between our systems... had tried before but scott's
 ml> system bounced my routed reply because tom wasn't in the nodelist
 ml> yet... that should be a non-problem pretty soon, i guess ;)

It's taken Tom (you) untill the easter weekend to get things working. I was 
waiting for him to get inbound binkp
sessions going before submitting the new net segment. That only happended on 
sunday.

 SW>> this issue wasn't present in versions before 1.0.7.13, as I've
 SW>> had nodes use the %+ALL before.

 ml> yeah, sounds like a bug in recent versions... i saw vince posted about
 ml> another bug, too... but anyway, hope you guys find and kill this bug
 ml> pretty easily :)

So do I, as a lot of new nodes use that when siging up. #-)






Stephen


--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303