Re: areafix bug?
  By: Stephen Walsh to mark lewis on Mon Apr 13 2020 21:46:31


 ml> that must be tom's new node, eh? i don't have an answer for the
 ml> problem... only dropping a line to note that i've been helping him get
 ml> his FTN stuff going and he/we were wondering why there hadn't been a
 ml> response to his areafix request at the time it was sent... delayed
 ml> processing maybe? no matter, really... just curious ;)

 SW> The mail hub system process mail just a few seconds after it's
 SW> dropped off.

cool... i wasn't sure... some systems (still) use scheduled processing instead 
of instant...

 SW> I have done a test from my bbs system, and it receives the message
 SW> about not fiding +ALL as well, so it's not  Tom's system at fault.

ok... i know we found some few problems here and there with his mailer setup 
that we got fixed... missing directories here and there and a few other 
things... we got that all fixed and we were able to test direct netmail between 
our systems... had tried before but scott's system bounced my routed reply 
because tom wasn't in the nodelist yet... that should be a non-problem pretty 
soon, i guess ;)

 SW> this issue wasn't present in versions before 1.0.7.13, as I've had
 SW> nodes use the %+ALL before.

yeah, sounds like a bug in recent versions... i saw vince posted about another 
bug, too... but anyway, hope you guys find and kill this bug pretty easily :)


)\/(ark
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux