From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: wheresourblessing{at}israels.wars
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:26:04 GMT, Wiseguy  a.k.a.,
"The Paper Tiger Plonker" plonked:

>wheresourblessing{at}israels.wars wrote in 
>news:vs3v49tq7kq42mr4u9kkametj3o195u2sl{at}4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 04:13:14 GMT, Wiseguy  wrote:
>> 
>>>wheresourblessing{at}israels.wars wrote in 
>>>news:sg1s49570p7joio90srv8d9fgq6vqocje9{at}4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:32:36 +1000,
"Daniel47{at}teranews.com"
>>>>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>Wiseguy wrote:
>>>>>> "Daniel47{at}teranews.com"
 wrote in
>>>>>> news:CnW2u.12713$F%.11367{at}fx18.iad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wheresourblessing{at}israels.wars wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The question wasn't a hard one. It's just
that your answer will 
>>>only
>>>>>>>> serve to expose your hypocrisy... one way
or the other.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And you don't want that, so of course,
that is why you refuse to
>>>>>>>> answer. And that is why you're mad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But even so, you still don't appear to be
"wise" enough to 
>>>understand
>>>>>>>> that your stubborn refusal to answer my
question exposes you as 
>>>well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So actually, my job is done here...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that mean you're going to P155 off then
and leave us 
>trekkers 
>>>to
>>>>>>> discuss Trek stuff here??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, he's too stupid for that.
>>>>>
>>>>>One can try, Wiseguy, one can try!!
>>>>>
>>>>>Daniel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Go eat some matzo and get over it, mohel, lol.
>>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>No one cares what you think and post.
>>>
>>>You're the only one too stupid to figure that out.
>> 
>> 
>> LOL.
>> 
>> The plonker replies again!
>> 
>
>Already explained that, stupid.
>
>Pay attention.  Stop looking at shiny objects and read and 
>comprehend...assuning you can.  Based on your stupid religious rants you 
>are obviously a moron.
>
>> LOL.
>> 
>> Hey, plonker...
>> 
>> Maybe you think it's normal that jews suck on sliced baby dicks.
>> 
>
>No I don't think that, I have a brain unlike you.
>
>> Well I don't. I think it's sick, perverted, and foul.
>> 
>> But it's soooo just like a jew... or maybe even... "yew".
>> 
>> LOL.
>> 
>
>
>What are you laughing at, yourself?  So are all of us.
>

What... you got a mouse in your pocket?

LOL.

>Laugh at the stupid idiot.


Oh, I am.

LOL

Believe me, I am.

LOL.

Plonk me again, please.

LOL.

-.-

"The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race
ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities
that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease,
confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without
taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is
wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of
display.
...

The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really
privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent
bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places
of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment
any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place
diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still
nicht gewuenscht ("not wanted.").
...

I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I
suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work,
worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must
differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright
spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish.
...

The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews
is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew
is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first
prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has
ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever
challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish
scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter
bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are
only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact
than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud
was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that
even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may
be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But
whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it
must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in
fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he
will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success.
But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability."

H. L. Mencken

--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux