It's 04 Oct 97 01:44:00,
We'll return to Jim Trulock and Tony Langdon's
discussion of Possible Network
JT> Is it better, then, to simply install TCP/IP on both computers, and
JT> leave out the IBMPEER network? Or should both be installed. I would
JT> also like to do work on my machine from mom's from time to time.
You need both TCP/IP and IBMPEER on your machine. They perform quite
different functions. TCP/IP is a transport which is required for
Internet access. IBMPEER is a network client and server for sharing
files, printers and modems. It can use TCP/IP or another protocol (e.g
NetBIOS/NetBEUI or IPX/SPX) to carry its data. As for remotely
accessing your machine, you'll need remote control software such as
OS2You/PM2You or similar if you want to control the GUI. For text mode
control, there are many options with varying levels of functionality.
JT> Ok, so do I need to set up both machines with a default IP address ...
JT> like 255.255.255.1 and 255.255.255.2, and just have each one routed to
These won't work. I'd suggest 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, netmask of
255.255.255.0
JT> the dynamic address I get when In-Joy would connect to my provider.
JT> (As you can probably tell, I know absolutely nothing about networking
JT> outside of what I've read here. )
I'm not sure of the correct way to interface your LAN with InJoy. It's
a case of reading the docs (I have officially allocated IP addresses
here and at work, use a proxy server instead of IP masquerading).
TL> I believe this is possible with a NET LOGON command in the startup
TL> sequence somewhere.
JT> Hmm ... just checked and I can't find a LOGON command for the NET
JT> command. ;(
You're right. :-( I'm not sure of the OS/2 equivalent (been using too
much Windoze lately ;-) ).
... I used to be a terrible flirt, but I'm much better at it now.
--- FMail/386 1.02
---------------
* Origin: The Bridge - Remote Sysop. (3:635/728.18)
|