ML> that's wierd... i seem to recall something somewhere to do with
ML> the formatt of the DFRS stuff but i don't recall if it is/was 
ML> anything in FD or if it was settings in the modems i was using at 
ML> the time... i don't know that it is anything critical, though... is 
ML> it?

 TJM>   22:21:29  Processing NetMail folder
 TJM>   22:21:29  No messages to send in this event
 TJM> = 22:21:31  RING
 TJM> = 22:21:34  CONNECT 115200/141158126138
 TJM> + 22:21:34  Incoming call at 115200 BPS
 TJM>   22:21:34  Sending text in \FD\BANNER2.TXT

 TJM> Here's my log file.  Wish I knew how to work around this.  I can
 TJM> guess what  the IP is, or check the netserial log, but it would be
 TJM> nice to have it  imported into the BBS correctly tho. :(

that's in IP number??? it looks like a connect message to me... 

here's what i get...


= 14:25:16  RING
= 14:25:20  RING
= 14:25:20  CONNECT 57600/ARQ/TEL FROM 192.168.42.7
+ 14:25:22  Incoming call at 57600 BPS
  14:25:24  Sending text in X:\FD\BAN11.FD


definitely a different format... you'll probably have an easier time
getting the folk who wrote your virtual modem driver to conform to a/the
more standard format... the above is more like the following industry
standardized format single line connect messages...

= 12:00:35  RING
= 12:00:41  RING
= 12:00:58  CONNECT 24000/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS

i can see why joho wouldn't want to have to recode that section... what you
show is really "out there" ;)

not trying to be negative or dissuade you... it doesn't really look like
bug that i can see...

)\/(ark