-=> Quoting ROBERT CRAFT to JEAN HALVERSON <=-
JH> I am a believer in de-evolution. Things are getting worse
JH> and worse. They _cannot_ get better. I suppose that is my
JH> philosophical basis for wanting to scrap the whole
JH> education system. I see cries for reform as nothing more
JH> than beating a dead horse.
RC> You don't think the return of schools to local control
RC> [county or smaller] is sufficient?
No. I really don't. The parents who would truly participate are those who
do the most work on their children's behalf anyway. The children who need
the most from the system are those whose parents don't give a flip.
De-evolution is more than an explanation of social processes leading to
chaos, it's more of a philosophy that gives a rather adequate (IMHO)
explanation for the fact that humanity is sliding down toward complete and
total idiocy. And I mean idiocy in the sense of declining IQ scores.
JH> But in the meantime many parents who care about their
JH> children are being forced to submit to these same laws,
JH> which basically take away their rights to choose the
JH> education they desire for their children.
RC> Oh, they can choose, but they end up paying twice: school
RC> taxes and private or home-schooling tuition.
No, actually we pay more than twice when you figure in the cost of remedial
education on the college level for those H.S. grads who are poor enough to
get government grants. Then figure in the cost of jail for those who
graduated without usable working skills or self esteem. I know that those
are really intangibles and can't be defined with numbers, but you get my
drift. I suppose that I'd like to see a return of trade guilds and
apprenticeship programs.
RC> I don't think we've reached the point where those rights
RC> are being removed; but I think it's accurate to say that
RC> families are indeed often *penalized* when they exercise
RC> those rights.
JH> Clinton basically made it illegal in Ark. for the parents
JH> of mentally handicapped children to decide for themselves
JH> what was the best educational option. His _wonderful_ law
JH> basically said that any parent who teaches such a child
JH> must have a degree specializing in that particular child's
JH> disability. Hopefully the law has been changed by now.
RC> I wasn't aware of this. I know that Congress did defeat the
RC> MisAdministration's attempt to stipulate that one had to
RC> have a teaching certificate in order to home-school one's
RC> children.
We in the homeschool groups heard about this and generally all voted
Republican. So much for us being a major political force.
JH> Also, there is at least one state in the union where
JH> homeschooling is illegal.
RC> Really? Which one?
I _believe_ it was New Mexico. I'd also heard that North Dakota's
requirements were so restrictive as to basically make it impossible. But
that was a while ago that I read these statistics. I'll look them up to make
sure when I figure out where I packed my resources.:)
JH> Actually, in most states the PTB regulate homeschooling.
JH> Texas doesn't, which was a stroke of most uncommonly good
JH> fortune for us as we didn't know before we moved here. I
JH> have a friend in PA. who actually is required to submit her
JH> curriculum for approval as well as a written lesson plan
JH> for the whole year.
RC> That's not difficult to do with the assistance of the many
RC> support groups. There are CD sets now available with all
RC> texts, tests and lesson plans for K-12 instruction. The
RC> availablity of the Internet and CD-ROM computers has
RC> resulted in an explosion of homeschooling.
It may or may not be difficult to do depending on your choice in educational
products. There are certain styles of teaching that are just about
impossible to provide documentation for, but they still achieve better
results than public school. Not all families can afford CD-ROM materials,
I know that we can't. And since almost all of us are doing this on one
income there are many who are living below the poverty level and only using
books from the public library.
But that is not the point. The point is that Public School
Superintendents should be concerned about their own responsibilities and
not have _complete_ jurisdiction over homeschoolers. What gives them the
expertise in telling us which curriculum is best for our family? Most of us
homeschool based on our first amendment right to practice our religious
beliefs without government interference anyway. We for the most part are
generally held accountable by our extended families and church leaders,
although there are a small minority who refuse to be accountable to anyone.
Still, to give someone in the public schools _complete_ say over whether
or not we homeschool is the problem.
JH> Actually the entire teachers union (I'm thinking NEA???)
JH> has quite a propaganda thing going on against us.
RC> The NEA should be prosecuted under either the RICO or
RC> monopoly statutes.
Hey, I whole-heartedly agree with that one. Even my grandfather, a retired
teacher of 15 years, agrees.
JH> Amazingly enough, the _one_ thing they argue is
JH> socialization, which is so hypocritical considering the
JH> amount of violence occurring in public schools these days.
JH> If _that_ is their definition of _good_ socialization then
JH> I want none of it!
RC> Most home-schooled kids I know of participate in church and
RC> sports activities.
Exactly. We have support group sponsored activities, church activities, not
to mention community sponsored activities (4-H) and sports available to us.
There've been years when I've been so involved that we had at least two
activities each week. But still, people will insist that age segregation
is better than natural exposure to people of all ages in natural settings.
RC> Given the results to date of homeschooling, I'd certainly
RC> have no objection if homeschoolers were to be reimbursed
RC> either the per capita amount expended by public schools or
RC> be granted a tax credit equivalent to homeschooling costs.
JH> I'll admit that's a rather nice idea, but Hades will boast
JH> more snowbunnies than Aspen before it happens.
RC> It's gonna be that long before we get a Republican
RC> President and Congress?
Do you honestly believe that this is going to be a priority when we get a
republican president and congress? And remember Goals 2000? IIRC, if not for
the phone campaign HR 6(? I can't recall the number) would have
been passed by our Republican Congress. Just because a candidate says he's
Republican does not mean he's approved by God. Christian and Republican
are not synonymous.
When we get a Republican President and Congress it may well take them four
years just to straighten out this mess.
Jean Halverson, cynicus extraordinarius
---
---------------
* Origin: * The Ratz Nest BBS * Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
|