CSc>> CS>Hmm... wasn't NT 3.5's NTFS more or less HPFS? Just a
CSc>> CS>different name?
CSc>> No. Although it was Microsoft (in partnership with IBM) who
CSc>> originally developed HPFS, NTFS is a different animal.
CS>> But in NT 3.1, they were almost 100% identical? I thnk 
CS>> I have heard someone saying that NT 3.1's FS was HPFS, 
CS>> but called NTFS. However, I am not certain that this is 
CS>> correct.
CH> NT's NTFS file system in NT 3.10 was not HPFS. My understanding is that 
it 
CH> is exactly the same file system as NT 4.0's NTFS.
We'll not exactly the same. NTFS has evolved over the different versions. One 
major difference between the two is compression.
Dale
--- Msged/NT 4.20 beta 2
---------------