> That depends on what your "ibm" hardware consists of.
 > Using a 286 under windows is slower than a C64.
 > I dunno what Network BBS is like these days, but the
 > last time I called
 > there it was slower than the IMAGE software for the
 > C64..  it took no
 > less than 15 minutes to compress a 100 message mail
 > packet (about 60k).
It's considerably faster than that now Rod, upgraded machines a while ago.
 > When Thistle Dome went offline all the C64 modemers
 > over here went back
 > into the woodwork due to lack of support.
 > As far as I can determine I am now the only active CBM
 > BBS user in SA.
 > :-(
Hopefully that'll change when Warren gets the Commodore Network BBS online
in Adelaide, course it is on an old XT, so will be roughly the same sort of
time as the original Network BBS

Artie

--- FMail 0.96â