CSc>> CS>Hmm... wasn't NT 3.5's NTFS more or less HPFS? Just a
CSc>> CS>different name?
CSc>> No. Although it was Microsoft (in partnership with IBM) who
CSc>> originally developed HPFS, NTFS is a different animal.
CS> But in NT 3.1, they were almost 100% identical? I thnk I have heard 
someone 
CS> saying that NT 3.1's FS was HPFS, but called NTFS. However, I am not 
CS> certain that this is correct.
No that's not correct. While they might have been similar, they were two 
seperate file systems. Windows NT 3.1 did fully support HPFS however.
Dale
--- Msged/NT 4.20 beta 2
---------------