G'day Bob,

 In a message dated 08 Nov 02 you wrote:

 CH>> I will if you like. P4 is outmoded and outdated. It doesn't need
 CH>> revision.  needs to be replaced with something that covers where Fido
 CH>> is not only toda but is heading in the future.

 BS> Working... Please wait...  ;-)

I'm sitting here patiently. Ready to put my hand up at ANY vote.

 BS> Just what do you think revisionism is, anyhow?  Amending parts of a
 BS> document a little at a time serves the same purpose as replacing it,
 BS> but in a way that's easily digested.

Odd that. I don't know of a single sysop who thinks P4 is worth keeping,
yet we're still stuck with it.

 BS> Instead of you (and all the other naysayers) crying "it can't
be done"
 BS> and/or "scrap the whole thing", why not put that energy
to good use by
 BS> lending effort to changing P4 (now and in the future).

Never have I said "it can't be done", though I've often asked why
it ISN'T done.

 Craig

... So, what else is there that you don't know?

--- Mail Manager 1.22x/n #1390