| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | what do I have here? |
JIM HOLSONBACK wrote in a message to ROY J. TELLASON: JH> Hello, Roy. JH> I've been meaning to write since way back on 11/21, when I JH> overheard you and Pascal Schmidt talking about - - RJT> Apparently the speed can go up there quite a bit, the package was RJT> wrong. Looks like if I were to get my hands on a K6-3 chip I RJT> could maybe go all the way up to 500MHz or so. They do say that RJT> going to a FSB speed of 83MHz is "overclocking the chipset" but RJT> don't seem to think that's a problem. JH> OK, I've read about taking older Socket 7 boards and hardware JH> hacking to get around the cpu core voltages and clock multiplier JH> jumper settings which they were originally designed for, but not JH> for a PCChips board. The one I read about was for Asus P55T2P4, JH> which had Intel HX chipset. That internet info you got able to be JH> sent as an email attachment? I'd like to get a look at it. I think so, if I can find it again, or at least if I can find the link. I unfortunately tend to do stuff like grabbing lots of info here and there and forgetting where it was that I got it from... Somebody in here mentioned "M571" (I think?) and this was the first or second thing that Google came up with, a pointer to the site, and the first thing I saw on the page was a picture of the board I had here. :-) I'll have a look, see what I can do. There wasn't much in the way of "hacking" required to get all sorts of stuff working, the people that sold the board didn't know that much about the chips and how setting apparent multipliers actually works differently for some parts. I think *one* setup required a resistor to be plugged across a set of pins rather than a jumper, but you used a jumper to make that happen, sort of. Kinda nifty, actually, and after reading that stuff I have a better understanding of how that stuff works. JH> Not that I think there is much danger of you springing for a K6-III JH> chip anytime soon - - last I saw, a K6-III 450 sold at Ebay for JH> $40 plus shipping. But K6-2 of the speeds up around 450-500 are JH> sometimes now selling at Ebay for fairly reasonable prices. I still have yet to get there. Maybe I should give it a shot with my current provider, since I'm seeing better connect speeds? Or maybe not, maybe I should wait until after I install the upgraded software that's sitting here... PS> I think the 500 and 550 MHz K6-2 versions want a 100 MHz FSB (at least PS> my 450 MHz wanted that). Slower versions can do with a lower frequency PS> (66 MHz), using a higher clock multiplier. I don't know whether a 500 PS> MHz K6-2 would want to run at 6 * 83 MHz. That sounds about right, I do recall the text I was reading on that board mentioning an 83 MHz bus speed, and how some peripheral cards might have a problem with that. JH> Yes, K6-2 will let you play with the clockmultipliers - - I have a JH> K6-2 475 in this box (meant to run at 95 x 5) and I'm only running JH> it at 400 (100x4). I can't say I recall ever seeing a Socket 7 JH> board which had jumper settings for clock-multiplier of 6. AFAIK, JH> the K6-2 line topped out at 550, and K6-III at 450. That agrees with my recollection too, I think (it's been a while), though there may have been a K6-500 mentioned in there someplace. JH> The writeups I saw about hacking and overclocking old Socket 7 JH> boards which were originally designed for chips down in the 200-233 JH> MHz range strongly recommended mounting a cooling fan over the JH> voltage regulator circuits for cpu. One of the boards I'd been using had a pair of those regulators and one time one of them got *real* hot, I couldn't keep my finger on it, it was so hot. But then the next time I checked it out it was barely warm, some odd behavior going on there for sure. I notice that some of these boards are using just linear circuits on big heat sinks, while others are using switching regulators, at least for the one of them. It's when I see a coil nearby that I get a clue. :-) Those seem to be the better-made boards, too. The one we're talking about is one of those. JH> Of course, a lot of the faster chips (e.g. K6-2 500) draw a good JH> bit more power than something like a P200 MMx, for which these JH> older boards were originally designed. That's something I haven't looked at yet... ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 396/45 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.