-=> /* Quoting Will Honea to Frank Sexton */ <=-
 FS> Agreed.  I found it much faster to just cancel after the
 FS> root (and to change the default NONE to ACCESS, or
 FS> whatever).  For one thing, applying the ACL list took
 FS> forever on each drive :-).  Without it, they work fine
 FS> anyway.  As long as you don't leave it set to NONE for
 FS> sharing.
 WH> Interesting comment.  My system used to take it's own
 WH> sweet time building the ACL but since I put in a new
 WH> drive (1.6g) it seems to pop right off.  More drive
 WH> space, faster result. Hmm... wonder why?
Or... maybe less files?
I dunno... seems like it took awhile on my drives. I set my
drives up this way the first time then changed 'em later. I
had four drives at the time. C:FAT-527Mb, D:FAT-527Mb,
E:HPFS-2.7Gb, F:HPFS-570Mb. None of 'em were more than
maybe 60% full.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about
a *long* time.  Just longer than I might have expected.
But... I'm new to ACL's.  So I'm no judge.
I do know that you can apply "permissions" to a very large
NT NTFS drive and watch it work its way all the way down
the subdirectories in a matter of a few seconds.  I
expected the ACL list to be about the same.  But... then...
I don't really know exactly what an ACL list is anyway :-).
-Frank
(fsexton@xpert.net - http://www.concentric.net/~fsexton)
--- Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
---------------