| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Knoppix |
Hi CHARLES! :-) CA> There are many Linux executables that operate at a lower level CA> than is wise IMO. I realize there are purists that insist this CA> is a good thing but really, for general use, it's not IMO. Basic Unix design principle - everything is a file. This has huge benefits, namely that a program does not have to care whether it operates on a file or a device. If it were otherwise, stuff like tar would need different code for writing to a file or writing to a tape drive. It also works the other way around - creating filesystems on image files instead of devices. That would probably not be possible at all if devices had a different interface from files. General use doesn't apply here, mostly. Most work should be from a user account, and a user should not have write access to critical device nodes. root can shoot himself in the foot, yes, but in many more ways than accidentally writing to a device file. Ciao Pascal --- Msged/LNX 6.1.1* Origin: Germano-Canadian Axis of Evil (1:153/401.2) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 153/401 307 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.