Niels, at 16:55 on Apr 23 1996, you wrote to ALL     PLEASE READ !!!!! ...

. . .[chomp]. . .

NP> With relation to Teddy's message in AVT re Mail Mover 
NP> complaints ( it shows that they do read the echo) it may be 
NP> a good idea to discuss in LOCSYSOP any possible solutions.  
NP> Some of the points of TML live in other states, (myself 
NP> being an example) and it may be that they could act as 
NP> AVTECH feeds to those states that are under question.  Only 
NP> VIC and  TAS at the moment but if Dave Hatch cuts Paul off, 
NP> then QLD and SA would also be affected.

NP> This would in effect make TML the AUSTRALIAN HUB for AVT. 
NP> Once a feed is established to each NET or (Capital city) the 
NP> moving problem becomes a local one and not a State to State 
NP> problem This would also have the addd benifit  of 
NP> eliminating the Black hole problem, (which is sure to return 
NP> again sometime) and give a much faster turnaround of AVT 
NP> mail for all.

NP> As a start, I am quite willing to pick up AVTECH from TML 
NP> and pass it to Teddy just as I am doing already for Locuser 
NP> and some other echos.

NP> This way the person acting as the carrier is an _active_ 
NP> participant in AVTECH, and by being so, would make their own 
NP> personal interest a security for the continued mail flow.

NP> Think about it.!!!!
NP> The mail movers are saying that _they_ don't agree with the 
NP> content of AVTECH and are considering non transport because 
NP> of that content!

NP> It is their privilege to act in this way if they wish,
NP> but my idea makes _US_ our own carriers

NP> COMMENTS  PLEASE   !!!!!!!

Yes. - but do I want to poll Sydney everyday to transport it . . .

If I must, I guess I would :-)

Of course I could then pick up LOCSYSOP and LOCUSER and save Bill the call.

David
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq/2 3.10