NP> HI Rod
NP> For your own AVT messages the following happened

NP> Not received in Hobart
NP> --------------------
NP> 6 of 10 on the 13/4
NP> 1     5        14/4
NP> 8     11       16/4

NP> Not received in Brisbane
NP> ------------------------
NP> 6 of 10 on the 13/4
NP> 11   11        16/4

NP> All others days since then have been OK

NP> I think that the above losses would have
NP> been an overflow on someomes system.

Yep, pretty convincing evidence.

NP> On a number of days there are more of your messages
NP> hitting Brisbane than left Sydney, but this is due
NP> to someones system splitting your long messages.

Shit, forgot about that, what a fuckup. I awked that list from
the OLX OUTBOX, before OLX does the splitting when making the REP.

I'll do another list, but its a bit more
tricky to do it over the outgoing PKTs.

NP> The extra's caused by splitting could however cover a lost
NP> message to Bris and I wouldn't know If you want the count
NP> to be exact then limiting your message length would ensure
NP> that the figures for Sydney, Hobart and Brisbane were all exact.

Probably better to just do the list properly by using the outgoing
PKTs as the input to the list generator instead. It covers a longer
period than the OLX OUTBOX anyway. Just not so convenient to Awk them.
@EOT:

---