TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: guns
to: NOLAN PENNEY
from: CLOYCE OSBORN
date: 1996-06-18 11:33:00
subject: Re: Okc bombing

 CO>I'd like to know the name of this "small business owner in OKC" that
 CO>you cite (if you're not just blowing smoke).  I've still got contacts
 NP> Personally, I found it very interesting that all seismagraphic
 NP> information clearly and pretty much irrefutably shows two distinct
 NP> blasts taking place.  The government insisists otherwise.  Ok...
Then you didn't follow the seismographic data very closely.  The schools who 
have seismographs and have followed this now agree that the second shock 
detected was the impact of a major portion of a large building striking the 
ground.  You see, seismographs don't detect blasts but, rather, shocks or 
disturbances in the earth's surface.  These shocks can be generated by a 
blast, something striking the earth, a volcanic eruption or an earthquake.
 NP> McVey (sp) insists a microship was stuck in his but.  The beloved
 NP> government and media ridicules this.  Yet there's the Army, steadfastly
 NP> acknowledging sticking micro chips in butts, including his.  Ok...
I'd like to know where you got this particular notion so please provide some 
documentation.  We get lots more media information here in Oklahoma that you 
likely do on the east coast and I have seen nothing to indicate that he has 
made such claim.
 NP> Perhaps, just perhaps, government explosive experts intentionally set a
 NP> bomb off in such a manner as to make it look rather amateurish?  After
 NP> all, if they blatently and clearly came in themselves, people would get
 NP> upset.
No, having seen the blast damage, I don't even find this plausible.  Sure, 
_perhaps_ they could have but, if so, they could have detonated the explosive 
closer to the center of the building rather than near the east end and thus 
obtained much more damage yet still make the explosion look like the work of 
amateurs.
 NP> And as a sidebar, I really find it interesting that the military is now
 NP> conducting "training" exercises by attacking and declaring martial law
 NP> on eastern seaboard cities.  Part of Pittsburg just last week got
 NP> attacked and placed under martial law for a day.  It's "training", it's
 NP> "necessary", it "helps".  Ok.
 NP> And the military opposes any public notifications of this..."training".
Once again, please provide plausible documentation for this.
Regards.  Cloyce.
--- EZPoint V2.2
---------------
* Origin: Res Ipsa Loquitur, Indian Territory (1:147/34.13)

SOURCE: echomail via exec-pc

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.