PS> Yes, I have tryed a few, but I came to like VAC++'s. 
 PS> Since it was PM based, 
 PS> and online-help works, since it's a VAC++ tool.
 PS> (And it's adcanced too)

Well, when I get the P166 on my desk, I'll let ya know what I think.  ;-)

 PS> I've tried some small stuff and gave it up. As far as 
 PS> OS/2 is concerned... 
 PS> Even if it was written in VAC++ (why not?) a can't 
 PS> imagine IBM using the VB 
 PS> (Visual Builder). It was the VB I meant that was 
 PS> genereting huge code, not 
 PS> VAC++ itself if that's what you thought.

I'll see if I can contact a few of the Warp development team once I start
my job and find out the _truth_ on this matter.  ;-)

 PS> _completely_ unusable 
 > (as in SLOW) on my machine.

 PS> Yeah! On my 16 meg, it needed about 5 minutes just to start up!

Only?  It took about 15-20 on mine... :-/



--- Maximus/2 3.01