From: Mike N. 

On Wed, 5 May 2004 20:58:27 -0400, "Geo."  wrote:

>Yes, this was for survival though, we doubled our normal support staff and
>still could not keep up with all the calls about infected machines.

   We already had 445 blocked from the blaster worm and didn't notice
anything unusual.   You'll have to repeat your support-and-patch exercise
for the next port 445 vulnerability.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5