Can you point me to some documentation I can present to support that view?

> From: "Robert Comer" 
> 1 timeout out of 4 in a ping is not normal.
> - Bob Comer
> "Ellen K"  wrote in message
> news:0096bf.c2a4c7{at}harborwebs.com...
>> Well, I didn't.
>> 
>> The latest is:
>> 
>> 1.  There were THREE NICs in the box, they disabled the two 10/100's and
> set
>> the gigabit one to manual, 1000 full duplex.
>> 
>> 2.  NewlyMintedNetworkGuy said something about the box having been
> configured
>> as a trunk (well, not "a trunk", but "trunk"
was in there somewhere) which
>> didn't make sense to him so now he made it just like my other server.
>> 
>> 3.  My development partner (who does the front ends) said actually on my
> other
>> server the users DO sometimes lose the connection.  (!)   He also said if
> the
>> ping test shows for example 3 packets received and 1 lost, that is normal.
>> (!!!)   However, he said he would be concerned if all the users lost their
>> connections at the same time.  So now I have the script running on two
>> different desktops and tomorrow we'll see whether they had problems at the
> same
>> time.   Also instead of searching for "Request timed
out" I will search
> for
>> "Received = 0".
>> 
>> 4.  NewlyMintedNetworkGuy said the network sniffer is busy sniffing the TJ
>> traffic and we can't use it, but he has some other tool he will set up.
>> 
>> 5.  The NT admin turned on PerfMon.
>> 
>> So tomorrow we should hopefully know more.
>> 
>> > From: John Cuccia 
>> > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 10:17:15 -0700, Ellen K.
>> >  wrote:
>> >> I will ask.
>> > No need, if you aren't using AD.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5