| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Setting interrupts |
Hi Steve, On 20-Jul-03, Steve McCrystal wrote to All: >> >Yeah, the level is determined by the number. Lower numbers are >> >given a higher priority. >> Sorta. IIRC, OS/2 reprograms the PICs. I'll have to look up the >> details, so ask me Wednesday. SM> You do, of course, RC. I don't have the info handy either, but SM> you have it right none the less! SM> If you post the reprogrammed order, I *WILL* have it handy! :^) Here you are, complete with where I found the information :-) From the Devcon CDROM or the DDK CDROM in PDDBASE.INF (OS/2 V2.1 Physical Device Driver Reference), under Physical Parallel Port Device Driver/subsection Parallel Port IRQ Performance:- "The Programmable Interrupt Controller (PIC) has been rotated under OS/2 2.1, giving IRQ3 (serial port) the highest priority in the system." So, the priority is 3,4,5,6,7,0,1,8,9(2),10,11,12,13,14,15. Somewhere else I seem to remember reading that if OS/2 finds the priority already rotated by the BIOS it leaves it alone (but I can't trace a reference for that). Note that the file with this noted in it is dated March 1994... :-) (Note that I'm reading this via FIDO). George --- Terminate 5.00/Pro* Origin: A country point under OS/2 (2:250/501.3) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 250/501 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.