| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Hard disk |
Hello Vatche! Saturday April 08 1995 07:57, Vatche Demirjian wrote to Glen Collins: >> What brand should I be geting?? > Conner is a good one... >> What is wrong with seagate... > Too many crashs >> Is Maxtor or Western Digital good?? > Very cheap, but very unreliable... :( > Maxtor used to be good, untill they where bought by some other company.. Where did you get this information from? I have two Conner drives (120mb and 170mb) (CP for Grant), a Seagate (120mb) and four Western Digitals (340mb, 420mb, 540mb and 730mb). The Seagate and Conner 120 are in the same machine; the Seagate is 4 years old, the Conner is almost two. The Seagate is considerably faster, and has been much more reliable than the Conner when mixing old disk caches and Windows 32-bit disk and file access. (When I was running PC Tools 6 cache with Windows 32bd/fa, the Conner would get lots of crosslinks etc and the Seagate was perfect. I can't really explain it, but there you have it.) I've never had any reliability problems with the Western Digitals, nor the Seagate. The Conner is also okay, but CPs are considerably slower than WD (and nobody except Grant Beastie has a CFS or CFA anyway.) Regards, Hamish --- GoldED 2.42.G1219+* Origin: Cloud Nine, +61-3-886-5195, Melbourne, Australia (3:632/552) SEEN-BY: 50/99 620/243 623/630 624/300 632/0 107 304 312 320 325 329 348 454 SEEN-BY: 632/502 503 506 516 525 527 530 552 998 999 1000 633/371 634/384 SEEN-BY: 634/391 397 635/301 502 503 544 553 636/100 637/103 638/100 639/100 SEEN-BY: 711/409 410 413 430 510 807 808 809 816 933 934 712/515 713/888 SEEN-BY: 714/906 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 632/552 998 635/503 50/99 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.